A New Paradigm Of Terrorism - 1537 Words

Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks many have sought to argue that a ‘New’ paradigm of terrorism exists and therefore that the nature of modern terrorist threats has changed. However, terrorism itself has never been clearly outlined, and as such both Copeland and Duyvesteyn argue current threats to be a continuation of older trends of traditional terrorism. More so terrorism is subjective and therefore current threats depends upon who the target is and who is reporting the attack. On the other hand, Hoffman focuses on deconstructing specifically the 9/11 attacks and in assessing potential future threats and as such is of greater use to governments seeking to deploy stringent countermeasures. The evolution of terrorist groups motivations and†¦show more content†¦In comparison Hoffman ignores the varying definitions concluding that ‘Terrorism is perhaps best viewed as the archetypal shark in the water’ (2002:313) which advances in order to survive. Thus , the concept has simply changed over time to remain relevant by combating counterterrorism efforts. Hoffman’s most apparent definition of terrorism is noted in Copeland’s article as â€Å"the deliberate creation and exploitation of fear through violence or the threat of violence in the pursuit of political change.’ (2001:3) However, in his own article he offers only a systematic clarification of terrorism in stating their aim to ‘undermine confidence in government and leadership’ (2002:313), which remains unchanged despite the context. Hoffman’s central argument focuses on the aftermath of 9/11 and therefore his definition holds the purpose of rethinking counterterrorism measures and merely as a byproduct in showing potential modern threats. To accurately analyse whether ‘New terrorism’ is relevant in understanding the current threats, a succinct definition of terrorism is needed so that its evolution can be noted. Although, th e general aim to achieve change at any cost remains the same. The current aims of â€Å"new† terrorism must be evaluated in historical terms to determine the potential severity of the threat as well as counter-methods and